Intelligent Design: Claims and Counter-claims

Intelligent Design and Creationism seem to be in the news every few months. This is one debate worth considering given the struggle to know how humans came to be. Are we here because of a higher power or did we evolve over millions of years?

1. Read this 2005 article about the claims and rebuttals to intelligent design.  What is intelligent design? What knowledge claims are made? What rebuttal, or counter-claims are given?

2. Learn more about these two very different perspectives. Visit this intelligent design web site http://www.intelligentdesign.org/ and explain the strengths and weaknesses of their claim.

3. Visit the National Center for Science Education web site http://ncse.com/creationism and explain the strengths and weaknesses of their claim.

4. In your knowledge issue question be sure to include reference to two ways of knowing.

5. Comment on one of your classmate’s responses

The Study of History

Man is the Measure by Reuben Abel is a seminal work about knowledge issues related to the shaping of history. This is required reading for every Theory of Knowledge class and serious academics will undoubtedly appreciate the ideas Abel considers. In this succinct summary of the main ideas, Abel helps us to see history from a variety of perspectives and interpretations.

Click on this link The Study of History Abel

Please read and write a comment/question.

Lies My Teacher Told Me

View excerpts from James Lowen’s Lies My Teacher Told Me and provide a comment for your classmates to view and discuss.

Lies my Teacher told me excerpts

The problem of history books containing errors and outright lies is a real problem. Check this link to read about the problem Virginia students are dealing with in their history book.

After reading both articles, explain the lies teachers tell and what you can do to improve the reliability of your knowledge of history.

The Meatrix

The Meatrix

What is behind the wall of illusion? How is our food processed? How are animals treated?

Do you really want to know?

What are arguments in favor of large-scale industrial food processing? What are the arguments against?

Which ethical concerns arise from this discussion?

BAFA BAFA Cross-Culture Simulation

This past week, my students and I participated in a cross-cultural simulation called Bafa Bafa, which is a significant title for the Beta culture. The Alphas do not learn the meaning of the name until the conclusion of the experience. Here’s how it works.

Students were divided into Alphas and Betas. Then they learned the rules and values of their new culture and began to play “games” related to those same values and rules. The Alphas are social, tactile, and paternalistic. The Betas, however, are individual, capitalistic, and goal-oriented. Next, an observer from each culture is sent to just observe and report. After discussion and hypothesis, the game continues and then small groups of visitors are sent to each culture. They are given artifacts and they are encouraged to try to learn the rules of the other culture. Each returning group of visitors report and brief discussions focus on claims, beliefs, language, interpretation, and culture.

The stated purpose of Bafa Bafa is to 1) explore the concept of culture 2) create feelings 3) analyze the process for gaining knowledge.

Specifically for Theory of Knowledge we want to consider these ideas:

belief, certainty, culture, evidence,
experience, explanation, interpretation, intuition, justification, truth, values
Click here for “Understanding Knowledge Issues” Understanding Knowledge Issues


The follow-up discussion created a range of strong emotional reactions and claims about each culture. Groups were even hostile toward one another (in a kind of playful manner like “Boo Alphas suck!). Our discussion questions can be reviewed here Bafa Bafa Discussion Questions

The next day, we brought our analysis away from the culture simulation and considered the more personal questions:

1. Which of your knowledge communities’ values and rules do you feel you best know? How might “outsiders” see you and your kn. community?

2. Have you felt like an “outsider” or visitor before? When? Why?

3. In our world, where do we see polarities like the Alphas and Betas?

We identified these alpha / beta analogous relationships:

male/female; Iran/USA; teacher/student; Pakistan/India; Muslim/Christian; World/USA; parent/child; science/religion; art/science; rich/poor and many more.

The entire experience lasted nearly three hours and we are considering these questions to further our personal reflection and insights:

Consider your BAFA BAFA experience and write a reflection, providing specific examples from your BAFA BAFA experience as well as examples from your life.

  1. How do cultures’ values differ with respect to the ways of knowing and areas of knowledge?
  2. How do beliefs about the world and beliefs about what is valuable, influence the pursuit of knowledge?
  3. What constitutes ‘good evidence’ within the different ways of knowing and areas of knowledge?
  4. What are the dangers of equating personal experience and knowledge?
  5. What are the difference between persuasive explanations, good explanations, and true explanations?
  6. To what extent does classification systems (labels and categories) adopted in the pursuit of knowledge affect the knowledge we obtain?
  7. To what extent does the truth of a statement depend on the language used to express it?
  8. To what extent do the different ways of knowing influence the values adopted by individuals and societies?

Ethics

Prof Michael Sandel presents the first in a series of lectures from his Harvard undergraduate course in Political Philosophy. He explores the morality of murder and asks whether there can ever be a case for killing.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/ Ethics

In addition, find arguments for and against War, Animal Rights, Male Circumcision, Euthanasia, Abortion, Forced Marriage, and Slavery.

Women Don’t Have Constitutional Protection Against Discrimination

WASHINGTON — The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not protect against discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation, according to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/scalia-women-discrimination-constitution_n_803813.html 

Are Justice Scalia’s arguments valid and logical? What are the implications of Justice Scalia’s argument? What other knowledge issues are present?